Professional indemnity/medical malpractice insurance—Awareness among medical students and consultants of India: An online survey study

Introduction: Professional indemnity (PI) or medical malpractice insurance (MMI) has been a hot topic considering the increasing number of medical negligence cases rising worldwide. However, there is a palpable difference in understanding and usage of this tool in developed countries and regions such as India. Aim: This study aimed to analyze the general understanding of resident doctors and consultants about MMI and knowledge about its technical jargon. Materials and Methods: We distributed short Google Form questionnaires about various aspects of MMI. We recorded the data from 141 resident doctors and 42 consultants in the Navi Mumbai area of India. As it was a survey, we required no ethical review. Results: As consultants’ experience grew, so did their understanding of medical indemnity. Approximately 90%, 64%, and 22% of consultants with 10 years, 5–10 years, and 5 years of experience had acquired PI. The AOY:AOT (any one year:anyone time) ratio was known to just 35% of these specialists. About half of the resident doctors were aware of PI and the effects of medical specialization on PI. Around a fifth of the individuals had only acquired the PI. Conclusion: There needs to be more clarity between the need and knowledge of MMI in India. This needs to be addressed by teaching medical postgraduates about it during training. “There should be special emphasis on medical indemnity in terms of its need, clauses, and cost during postgraduate medical training.”

Infracción del deber de cuidado y responsabilidad penal del profesional de la salud

Introducción: A pesar de su antigüedad la cuestión de la responsabilidad jurídico-penal del profesional de la salud adquiere cada vez mayor importancia en el orden teórico y práctico, en cuyo escenario se pone de manifiesto una excesiva judicialización de la actividad médica como mecanismo de tutela de los derechos del paciente. Objetivo: Sistematizar las diferentes posturas teóricas que en la actualidad se aprecian en torno a la judicialización de la actividad médica y las causas que la estimulan. Método: Se llevó a cabo un estudio de carácter documental a través de una revisión bibliográfica exhaustiva en buscadores bibliográficos como Scopus, SciELO, Google Académico y PubMed. La indagación de carácter argumentativa y exploratoria se realizó el 16 de marzo de 2023 y de los 30 artículos encontrados que abordaron la problemática de la mala praxis médica, solo 11 fueron elegidos para el estudio según criterios de selección. Desarrollo: Se sistematizaron las posturas teóricas sobre la judicialización de la actividad médica y las causas que la estimulan; además se determina la correcta interpretación de la lex artis como mecanismo de heterointegración normativa del deber de cuidado del ejecutor de actos médicos, en aras de evitar excesos en la aplicación de la ley penal en este ámbito de actuación profesional. Consideraciones finales: Una mayor intervención del Derecho Penal en el ejercicio de la Medicina no es el paradigma político criminal más eficiente en aras de proteger la vida e integridad del paciente frente a hechos de mala praxis médica.

Introduction: Legal and criminal liability of the health professionals, regardless its antiquity, at present has becoming more and more theoretical and practical relevance in which an excessive judicialization of medical activity is revealed as a mechanism for the protection of patient rights. Objective: Systematization of the different theoretical positions that are currently identified around the judicialization process of medical activity and the likely causes that stimulate it. Method: A documentary study was carried out through an exhaustive bibliographic review in bibliographic search engines such as Scopus, SciELO, Google Scholar and PubMed. The argumentative and exploratory research was conducted on March 16, 2023 and of the 30 articles found concerning medical malpractice, only 11 were chosen for the study with strict selection criteria. Development: The theoretical positions on the judicialization of medical activity and the causes that stimulate it were systematized; in addition, the correct interpretation of the lex artis was presented as a mechanism of normative heterointegration of the duty of care by the medical personnel, in order to avoid excesses in the application of the criminal law in this area of professional activity. Final considerations: A much greater intervention of criminal law in the practice of medicine is not the most efficient policy to protect the life and integrity of the patient in the face up to the medical malpractice.

Introdução: Apesar de sua idade, a questão da responsabilidade jurídico-penal do profissional de saúde adquire cada vez maior importância na ordem teórica e prática, cenário em que se revela uma excessiva judicialização da atividade médica como mecanismo de proteção dos direitos. do paciente. Objetivo: Sistematizar as diferentes posições teóricas que se apreciam atualmente em torno da judicialização da atividade médica e as causas que a estimulam. Método: Foi realizado um estudo documental por meio de revisão bibliográfica exaustiva em buscadores bibliográficos como Scopus, SciELO, Google Acadêmico e PubMed. A investigação argumentativa e exploratória foi realizada no dia 16 de março de 2023 e dos 30 artigos encontrados que abordavam o problema da impericía médica, apenas 11 foram escolhidos para o estudo de acordo com os critérios de seleção. Desenvolvimiento: Foram sistematizados os posicionamentos teóricos sobre a judicialização da atividade médica e as causas que a estimulam; Além disso, determina-se a correta interpretação da lex artis como mecanismo de heterointegração normativa do dever de cuidado do executor de atos médicos, a fim de evitar excessos na aplicação do direito penal neste campo de atuação profissional. Considerações finais: Uma maior intervenção do Direito Penal no exercício da Medicina não é o paradigma político criminal mais eficiente a fim de proteger a vida e a integridade do paciente contra atos de imperícia médica.

Responsabilidad médica profesional, guías para la práctica clínica y lex artis. La importancia de seguir las recomendaciones de las guías clínicas / Professional medical liability, clinical practice guidelines and Lex Artis. The importance of following clinical practice guidelines recommendations

Resumen La responsabilidad médica profesional es el resultado de mala praxis médica, la cual puede deberse a negligencia, impericia o imprudencia. Se conoce como lex artis al conjunto de conocimientos y habilidades que han sido universalmente aceptados por los pares, los cuales deben ser diligentemente aplicados en la situación específica de un paciente determinado. Entonces, lex artis es fundamentalmente todo lo contenido en las guías para la práctica clínica. Judicialmente hablando, en México el ejercicio de la medicina es una obligación de medios, mas no de resultados. Por consiguiente, apegarse a las recomendaciones de las guías para la práctica clínica es más efectivo para defenderse de una demanda legal por mala praxis.

Abstract Professional medical liability is the result of medical malpractice, which may be due to negligence, incompetence or carelessness. Lex Artis is the set of skills and knowledge that have been universally accepted by peers, which must be diligently applied in the specific situation of a given patient. Thus, Lex Artis is essentially everything contained in clinical practice guidelines. Judicially speaking, the practice of medicine in Mexico is an obligation of means, but not of results. Therefore, adherence to clinical practice guidelines recommendations is the most effective way to defend oneself against a malpractice lawsuit.

Defensive Medicine in the Context of the Indian Health System

Defensive medicine; although a recent concept, is slowly beginning to cement its place in the Indian health system. An interaction of multiple factors has paved way for this form of practice. Need for certainty of the diagnosis, lack of hierarchy in medical care, exponential growth of micro/super specializations and private/corporate health institutions, incentive-based practice, increasing incidences of violence against health personnel, rising trend of defamation suites against doctors, bad publicity by media, and interference by elected representatives have jeopardized the situation. This has led to decline in practice of clinical medicine, increased burden of investigations, especially in already compromised public facilities, and high out-of-pocket health expenditure. As much as ethical medical practice, standard patient management protocols, strict protection of interest of medical practitioners by law, responsible role of media and elected representatives are the need of the hour; we need to find ways to accept and incorporate defensive medicine into the modern medicine. Different stakeholders are required to come together and take substantial steps to understand the phenomenon and preserve the art and science of practicing medicine in its true form.

Las negligencias más comunes en la práctica odontológica / The most common negligence in dental practice

Para el adecuado ejercicio de la odontología, los procedimientos realizados deben ejecutarse apegándose en todo momento a las normas y principios éticos propios de la profesión. Cuando un odontólogo decide, por voluntad propia, ejercer la profesión sin apegarse a dichos principios, se considera que actúa con negligencia. La negligencia se caracteriza por ser un acto indebido, en el cual el profesional ejecuta por voluntad propia acciones injustificables capaces de producir daños en la salud de los pacientes o en el pronóstico de un tratamiento. Los actos negligentes, además de atentar contra la integridad del paciente, ponen en riesgo a los profesionales de la salud que los cometen de sufrir consecuencias legales derivadas de dichos actos. El objetivo del presente artículo consiste en definir el concepto de negligencia, describir las formas más comunes en las que ésta se comete durante la consulta odontológica así como sus posibles consecuencias legales, ilustrándolas a su vez con la breve presentación de algunos casos (AU)

For the proper practice of dentistry, the procedures performed must be carried out adhering at all times to the standards and ethical principles of the profession. When a dentist voluntarily decides to practice the profession without adhering to these principles, he is considered to be acting negligently. Negligence is characterized as an improper act, in which the professional voluntarily executes unjustifiable actions capable of causing damage to the health of patients or the prognosis of a treatment. Negligent acts, in addition to threatening the integrity of the patient, put health professionals at risk who commit legal consequences derived from these acts. The aim of this article is to define the concept of negligence, to describe the most common ways in which it is committed during the dental practice as well as its legal consequences, illustrating them in turn with a brief presentation of some cases (AU)

Identification Principle and Thought of "Medical Malpractice" Based on Theoretical Analysis / 法医学杂志

At present, medical disputes are still widely-concerned social problems and occasionally evolve into severe social events. In the dispute settlement mechanism, forensic identification opinion is the important technical support. Due to the high professionalism and complexity of medicine, the identification of medical malpractice has become major and difficult problem in the identification. This paper systematically analyze the concept of medical malpractice and five legal theories of malpractice determination, pointing out that China's forensic identification of medical damage should be led by the theory of "medical standards", supplemented by "prudent patient" standard and strengthen "peer review" in form. At the same time, seven main identification principles should be followed in practice: (1) take "obligation of diagnosis and treatment" as the basic principle of medical malpractice identification; (2) take whether to fulfill the obligation of diagnosis and treatment corresponding to current medical level as the specific principle; (3) take diagnosis and treatment routine, norms and guidelines as the main basis; (4) the principle of "peer review"; (5) the principle of "the generality of medical emergency action"; (6) the principle of "notification-informed-consent"; (7) the principle of "review of complications". This paper also puts forward the corresponding identification ideas in view of the above principles, hoping this helps standardize medical damage forensic identification activities.

Pattern and outcomes of medical malpractice cases in Ghana: a systematic content analysis

Objectives: Medical malpractice complaints are apparently on the rise in Ghana. Though it has been suggested that medico-legal training programmes should emphasise the kinds of legal problems that healthcare staff encounter most frequently in practice, no comprehensive study currently analyses the pattern and outcomes of existing case laws. Design: Systematic content analysisData sources: Medical malpractice case laws sourced from Ghanaian legal repositories, media platforms and other grey literature sources. Results: Nine case laws were retained. Most of the cases (n=7) involved negligence. Emerging patterns of cases are complex, including patients' access to their medical records, practising without a license/ out of scope, refusal to treat, and the development of complications following surgical interventions. Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Surgery, and Paediatrics were the main clinical specialties involved in the malpractice cases identified. Conclusions: The pattern of the cases suggests that all medical specialties are potentially at risk, although most of the cases emerged from Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Surgery, and Paediatrics. Medico-legal training for healthcare staff should emphasise the duty of care and adherence to the Ghana Health Service Patient Charter

Denuncias por mala práctica odontológica en Costa Rica: Análisis de 124 casos en el período 2015 - 2020 / Dental malpractice lawsuits in Costa Rica: analysis of 124 cases in the period 2015-2020

Resumen Introducción: En Costa Rica las demandas por mala práctica, mala praxis o responsabilidad profesional se encuentran tipificadas bajo el delito de lesiones culposas según el Código Penal de Costa Rica. Este estudio tiene como propósito describir las características de todas las demandas analizadas por la Unidad de Odontología Forense del Departamento de Medicina Legal en un período de seis años (2015-2020). Materiales y métodos: Se realizó una revisión detallada en la base de datos del Sistema de Medicina Legal (SIMEL) del Departamento de Medicina Legal del Organismo de Investigación Judicial de la totalidad de denuncias de "mal praxis" odontológica presentadas desde el 01 de enero de 2015 hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2020. La información recopilada fue tabulada en Excel e incluyó la clasificación por año, especialidad odontológica relacionada, sexo del denunciante y resultado del análisis pericial. Resultados: El análisis de los datos permitió determinar que de las 124 denuncias las disciplinas con mayores porcentajes fueron la cirugía oral y maxilofacial (39,52%), implantes dentales (16,94%) y ortodoncia (12,9%). Más de dos terceras partes (66,12%) de las denuncias corresponden a mujeres y dentro de los resultados de las pericias un 10% de los casos resultaron positivos, un 32% son negativos y un 58 % resultan no concluyentes. Conclusiones: El expediente odontológico completo es indispensable para lograr determinar un nexo de causalidad entre los hechos investigados y los resultados de un tratamiento; en Costa Rica los procedimientos invasivos generan mayor posibilidad de demandas, las mismas pueden ser evitadas mediante un adecuado manejo de los riesgos y complicaciones, comunicación adecuada paciente-tratante y manejo de las expectativas del tratamiento.

Abstract Introduction: In Costa Rica, dental malpractice lawsuits (professional liability) are classified under the crime of culpable injuries according to the Criminal Code of Costa Rica. The purpose of this study is to describe the characteristics of all the claims analyzed by the Forensic Dentistry Unit of the Department of Legal Medicine in a period of six years (2015-2020). Materials and methods: A detailed review was carried out in the database of the Legal Medicine System (SIMEL) of the Legal Medicine Department of the Organismo de Investigación Judicial (Judicial Investigation Agency) of all the complaints of dental "malpractice" filed since January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2020. The information collected was tabulated in Excel and classified by year, related dental discipline, sex of the complainant and the result of the expert analysis. Results: The data analysis determined a total of 124 complaints, the disciplines with the highest percentages were oral and maxillofacial surgery (39.52%), dental implants (16.94%) and orthodontics (12.9%). More than two thirds (66.12%) of the complaints correspond to women and within the results of the forensic report 10% of the cases were positive, 32% negative and 58% inconclusive. Conclusions: The complete dental record is essential to be able to determine a causal link between the investigated facts and the results of a treatment; in this study more than 50% of the files where incomplete, invasive procedures such as oral surgery generate a greater possibility of lawsuits that could be avoided through proper management of risks and complications, adequate patient-caregiver communication, and management of treatment expectations.

Reclamos contra la conducta ética en el ejercicio de la medicina. Análisis de las causas ingresadas a un Tribunal de Ética del Colegio Médico de Chile

Background: The Ethics Committees of medical associations define standards of conduct to avoid improper professional behavior. Aim: To identify the areas of professional behavior with most allegations of misconduct. Material and Methods: Analysis of all ethical claims received at the Regional Ethics Court of the Chilean Medical Association between 2016 and 2021. Results: Of 323 cases analyzed, 17% of complaints argued a failure in achieving a satisfactory standard of medical care, 15% unprofessional behavior, 14% disruptive interaction among physicians, 12% failure to fulfill therapeutic expectations, 6% poor quality of care, 6% fraud, 6% complains against institutions, 6% sexual misconduct, 6% inappropriate billing, 3% diagnostic errors, 3% inappropriate social behaviors, 1% refusal to provide a sick leave and 1% illegal practice. Only 41.5% of complaints were filed against registered physicians, thus limiting the capabilities of the medical ethical board. Conclusions: The most common complaints observed were professional misconduct and relationship problems between physicians.

Reclamos por atención en salud: experiencia en un centro privado / Analysis of healthcare claims received at an audit unit of a clinical hospital

Background: The resolution of claims at healthcare institutions is an important issue for administrators. Aim: To analyze the causes of healthcare-related claims in a private, clinical health center. Material and Methods: All claims processed at the audit unit of a clinical hospital between 2016 and 2019 were analyzed. Results: In the study period, 602 complaints were recorded, representing a rate of one claim for every 1,000 services provided. The two main causes of complaints were sub-standard interaction with the doctor such as communication or lack of empathy, corresponding to 21% of cases, and complaints related to care costs, quotes, and insurance coverage (21%). The highest number of complaints originated in emergency care, but the highest rate by number of healthcare services provided occurred in hospitalization in the Mental Health and the Adult Critical Care units. Roughly, 75% of the complaints were settled with a phone call to the patient, which allowed to explain what happened and to apologize accordingly. In 21% of the cases, one or more meetings were held with the patient, a family member, or his/her legal representative to settle an agreement. In 3.5% of cases a mediation process through an independent third party was required. Only 1% of the claims resulted in a legal action. Conclusions: The importance of cultivating an adequate physician-patient relationship for the prevention of complaints and eventual litigations associated with the provision of healthcare services, is emphasized. Quality control policies and processes within healthcare organizations should be strengthened.

Demandas por Malpraxis en Distintas Etapas del Tratamiento en Implantología Oral: Una Revisión

RESUMEN: Las demandas por malpraxis en odontología se han incrementado en los últimos años, siendo la implantología una de las especialidades más litigadas. Estas demandas en su mayoría se han caracterizado por tener un carácter multifactorial, con errores reportados en cualquiera de sus fases diagnósticas, terapéuticas o de mantenimiento. El propósito de esta revisión fue establecer la etapa del tratamiento implantológico en la que más se realizaron demandas por malpraxis, estableciendo una categorización de los errores detectados y de los daños asociados a cada una de las fases que incluye el tratamiento de rehabilitación mediante implantes dentales. Se realizó una revisión con búsqueda sistemática de los últimos 10 años en las bases Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, complementada con una búsqueda manual en revistas especializadas y en Google Scholar de artículos a partir de términos clave en idiomas español inglés y portugués. Se identificaron solo 3 artículos que cumplieron los criterios de selección, lo que afirma el concepto de escasa atención hacia esta eventualidad. Las demandas identificadas en esos reportes fueron analizadas sobre cuatro tipos de riesgo en implantología según la etapa del tratamiento en la que aparecen. La etapa quirúrgica fue identificada como la de mayor potencial de riesgo de originar eventos adversos y demandas asociadas. Se sugiere profundizar en los aspectos medicolegales propios y genéricos de la especialidad, como así también en el desarrollo de estrategias que prevengan sus eventos adversos y la judicialización asociada.

ABSTRACT: Dental malpractice claims have increased in recent years, and implantology is one of the most litigated specialties. Most of these claims have been characterized by having a multifactorial nature, with errors reported in any of their diagnostic, therapeutic or maintenance phases. The purpose of this review was to establish the stage of implant treatment in which the most malpractice claims were made, establishing a categorization of the errors detected and damages associated with each of the phases that includes rehabilitation treatment using dental implants. A review was carried out with a systematic search of the last 10 years in Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science and SciELO databases, complemented with a manual search in specialized journals and in Google Academic, of articles from key words in Spanish, English and Portuguese languages. Only 3 articles were identified that met the selection criteria, which affirms the concept of scant attention given to this eventuality. The claims identified in these reports were analyzed on four types of risk in implantology according to the stage of treatment in which they appear. The surgical stage was identified as the one with the highest risk potential of causing adverse events and associated demands. It is suggested to deepen the specific and generic medico-legal aspects of the specialty, as well as in the development of strategies to prevent adverse events and the associated litigation.

Errores de administración de medicamentos en enfermería / Medication administration errors in nursing

Introducción: los errores en el proceso de administración de medicamentos (EPAM) corresponden a múltiples factores, como: la condición de vulnerabilidad del usuario, dinámica que se vive dentro de las propias unidades y confusión en la terapia farmacológica, entre otros. El mayor porcentaje de los EPAM se produce en la etapa de administración, por lo que el rol de enfermería es fundamental. Existen diversas estrategias destinadas a la prevención, con distintos niveles de complejidad, en términos de implementación. Objetivo: conocer las múltiples causas que llevan al personal de enfermería a realizar una mala praxis en el proceso de administración de medicamentos. Material y métodos: se realizó una revisión de literatura mediante la búsqueda de artículos científicos en las siguientes bases de datos: Cochrane, Embase, Medline y SciELO. Conclusión: es indispensable hacer conciencia de la responsabilidad en los profesionales de enfermería para cumplir con las normas en la administración de medicamentos, con los "10 correctos" y evitar riesgos innecesarios a los pacientes que pueden en algunos casos ocasionar consecuencias graves.

Responsabilidad penal médica y seguridad jurídica en contextos de pandemia / Liability and legal security of healthcare professionals in the context of a pandemic

This paper deals with the relevance of bioethical guidelines for the prioritization of patient care. These guidelines should guide health professionals' triage procedures in exceptional situations of resource shortage. Also, they would contribute to evaluate the legal liability of professionals in these situations.

Trigeminal neuralgia after corneal transplantation - a case report / Neuralgia do trigêmeo pós-transplante de córnea - relato de caso

ABSTRACT Description of a patient with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy submitted to a corneal transplant, performed by Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, which evolved with sudden, paroxysmal pain in the frontotemporal region, postoperatively. Due to the ophthalmologic picture of the patient, the attending physician believed in possible rejection of the graft, neglecting the complaint of pain. Even after a successful second transplant, performed due to primary failure, disabling pain persisted and the physician did not manage it. After years of investigation, consulting with several specialists, it was concluded the patient presented trigeminal neuralgia that had not been treated since the surgical procedure. In addition, it led to several psychosocial consequences. Therefore, it is essential to be aware trigeminal neuralgia is a possible outcome of corneal transplantation, and its symptoms should not be neglected by the attending physician, thus contributing to better management for transplanted patients.

RESUMO Descrição do relato de caso de uma paciente com distrofia endotelial de Fuchs submetida a transplante de córnea, realizado pela técnica DMEK, que evoluiu com quadro de dor súbita, paroxística, em região frontotemporal, no pós-operatório. Devido ao quadro oftalmológico da paciente, o médico assistente acreditava em possível rejeição do enxerto, negligenciando a dor. Mesmo após sucesso do segundo transplante, realizado devido à falência primária, as dores incapacitantes persistiam, e nenhuma conduta, por parte do médico, foi realizada. Após anos de investigação, mediante consultas com diversos especialistas, concluiu-se que a paciente apresentava um quadro de neuralgia do nervo trigêmeo que não tinha sido tratada desde a realização do procedimento cirúrgico. Além disso, apresentava uma série de consequências psicossociais. Portanto, torna-se imprescindível entender que a neuralgia do nervo trigêmeo é um possível desfecho do transplante de córnea, e seus sintomas não devem ser negligenciados por parte do médico assistente, contribuindo para melhores condutas para os pacientes transplantados.

Dental extraction and full mouth root canal therapy in a patient with atypical odontalgia: Report of invasive malpractice / Extração dentária e terapia de canal radicular total em um paciente com odontalgia atípica: relato de terapia invasiva por erro diagnóstico

Atypical odontalgia is a pain disorder featured by constant pain without any obvious dental pathology. We report a 38-year-old man having chronic orofacial pain in the past two years. The pain was first located in the left maxillary premolar-molar region, but spread to the contra lateral mandible, occipital region, head and shoulders over time. The pain was described as dull and continuous with the intensity of #6 (VAS), and not relieved even after root canal therapy of all teeth and extraction of wisdom teeth . Some comorbid conditions such as TMJ problems and involvement of masticatory muscles were also reported. Finally, the diagnosis of atypical odontalgia was established due to lack of evidence for any organic pathology on clinical and paraclinical investigations, and a combination therapy including fluoxetine and clonazepam was started. Dental practitioners should consider AO when confronting toothache without any reasonable organic cause and avoid unnecessary dental procedures (AU)

A odontalgia atípica (OA) é um distúrbio doloroso caracterizado por uma dor constante sem qualquer patologia dentária óbvia. Relatamos um homem de 38 anos com dor orofacial crônica nos últimos dois anos. A dor foi inicialmente localizada na região pré-molar-molar superior esquerdo, mas se espalhou para o lado oposto da mandíbula, região occipital, cabeça e ombros ao longo do tempo. A dor foi descrita como maçante e contínua com a intensidade de # 6 (EVA), e não aliviada mesmo após tratamento de canal de todos os dentes e extração dos dentes do siso. Algumas comorbidades como problemas de ATM e envolvimento dos músculos mastigatórios também foram relatadas. Finalmente, o diagnóstico de odontalgia atípica foi estabelecido devido à falta de evidência para qualquer patologia sistêmica nas investigações clínicas e exames complementares, e uma terapia combinada incluindo fluoxetina e clonazepam foi iniciada. Os dentistas devem considerar OA ao enfrentar uma dor de dente sem qualquer causa sistêmica razoável e evitar procedimentos odontológicos desnecessários (AU)

Set-Up Madness: A Review

@#Psychosis can be defined as a mental disorder in which a person’s thoughts, affective response, ability to recognize reality, and ability to communicate and relate to others are sufficiently impaired to grossly interfere with his or her capacity to deal with reality. The classical characteristics of psychosis are impaired reality testing, hallucinations, delusions, and illusions. While factitious disorder and malingering are usually acknowledged as contrived psychiatric conditions for acquisition of interior or exterior profits, respectively, another alternative, also, exists that though is not manufactured individually, is enforced peripherally. Such cases, which are usually referred by the judge’s ruling, for evaluation and treatment, are more important than comparable simulated or genuine mental conditions, because incorrect diagnosis, or careless, cagily, and guarded validation of preliminary diagnosis that has been issued in the authorized or emergency department, can seriously endanger the individual’s civil rights, while it should not be overlooked that incorrect diagnosis is a kind of malpractice that may harm an individual awfully. In the present article the clinical picture of the said situation, in addition to some case histories, and recommendable hints for differential diagnosis between different types of psychoses, has been discussed.

The teaching of Medical Law in Brasil

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: To provide a brief overview of the teaching of medical law in Brazilian law schools, proposing a syllabus if needed. METHODS: Survey the curricula of the best-ranked Law Schools in the country and reference Law Schools in the USA and Europe. Analyze the disciplines offered and their relation to the actual demands of the industry. RESULTS: The offer of medical law disciplines in Brasil is very scarce and concentrated in one city (São Paulo). Most of the few existing disciplines focus on bioethical issues rather than law and lawsuits. CONCLUSION: There is a need to reformulate the teaching of medical law in Brasil by including new disciplines and broadening the subjects approached.

RESUMO OBJETIVO: Apresentar um breve panorama da situação do ensino do direito médico nas faculdades de direito brasileiras, com a proposta de uma matriz curricular, se necessário. MÉTODO: Levantamento dos currículos das Faculdades de Direito mais bem classificadas do país e das Faculdades de Direito de referência nos EUA e Europa. Análise das disciplinas oferecidas e sua relação com as reais demandas da área. RESULTADOS: A oferta de disciplinas de direito médico no Brasil é muito escassa e concentrada em uma cidade (São Paulo). A maioria das poucas disciplinas existentes enfoca questões bioéticas, em vez de leis e ações judiciais. CONCLUSÃO: há necessidade de reformulação do ensino do direito médico no Brasil, com inclusão de novas disciplinas e ampliação das disciplinas abordadas.

Civil claims related to dental care in Chile according to court rulings 2011-2017 / Reclamaciones civiles relacionadas con la atención odontológica en Chile según sentencias judiciales 2011-2017

Objective: To describe Civil Claims (CCs) related to the provision of dental care according to court rulings published on the website of the Chilean Judicial Power. Material and methods: Descriptive study of 62 CCs filed against dentists or dental clinics according to court rulings available on the website of the Chilean Judicial Power between the years 2011 ­ 2017, identified by court rulings using a keyword search. Data were tabulated and analyzed using EXCEL and Stata.15, through descriptive statistics, proportions comparison test, and Spearman's Rho test. Results: An increase in the number of CCs according to the 2011-2017 court rulings was observed. CCs were filed on average 27.5 months after the events occurred. Judicial processes lasted a mean of 27 months, and the Araucanía region accounted for the highest rate. The highest number of lawsuits were placed against male general dentists with a mean age of 44, filed by female patients with a mean age of 46. A total of 66.13% of the CCs were rejected by the court, and 33.87% were ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. The financial compensation claims reached an average of $37,751,516 CLP (1500.32 Chilean UF), approximately $47,000 USD as of the date of the data collection process. Conclusion: There is an upward trend in the filing of CCs in Chile, although most were rejected by the court. A better understanding of the reasons that lead to the legal processes is necessary to prevent their occurrence.

Objetivo: Describir los Reclamos Civiles (CC) relacionados con la prestación de atención odontológica según sentencias judiciales publicadas en el sitio web del Poder Judicial de Chile. Material y Métodos: Estudio descriptivo de 62 CC interpuestas contra dentistas o clínicas dentales según sentencias judiciales disponibles en el sitio web del Poder Judicial de Chile entre los años 2011 - 2017, identificadas por sentencias judiciales mediante búsqueda por palabra clave. Los datos se tabularon y analizaron mediante EXCEL y Stata.15, mediante estadística descriptiva, prueba de comparación de proporciones y prueba Rho de Spearman. Resultados: Se observó un aumento en el número de CC según las sentencias judiciales de 2011-2017. Los CC se presentaron en promedio 27,5 meses después de ocurridos los hechos. Los procesos judiciales duraron una media de 27 meses y la región de la Araucanía registró la tasa más alta. El mayor número de demandas se presentaron contra dentistas generales varones con una edad media de 44 años, interpuestas por pacientes mujeres con una edad media de 46 años. El 66,13% de las CC fueron rechazadas por el tribunal y el 33,87% falló a favor. de los demandantes. Los reclamos de compensación económica alcanzaron un promedio de $ 37.751.516 CLP (1500,32 UF chilenas), aproximadamente $ 47.000 USD a la fecha del proceso de recolección de datos. Conclusión: Existe una tendencia ascendente en la presentación de CC en Chile, aunque la mayoría fueron rechazadas por el tribunal. Es necesario comprender mejor las razones que conducen a los procesos legales para prevenir su ocurrencia.

Teleconsulta médica: os limites éticos e o risco de negligência informacional / Medical teleconsultation: ethical limits and the risk of informational negligence / Teleconsulta médica: límites éticos y riesgo de negligencia informativa

Objetivo:levantar a legislação vigente sobre a teleconsulta e realizar sua análise a partir do conceito de consulta médica e da necessidade do exame físico direto do paciente para a sua caracterização, bem como as limitações impostas pelo Código de Ética Médica (CEM) do Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM), por seus pareceres e resoluções dos Conselhos Regionais, visando apontar seus limites e riscos de negligência médica informacional. Metodologia:revisão qualitativa e integrativa da legislação vigente, da literatura médica e jurídica especializada. Resultados: a prática da telemedicina é regulada pelo Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM), mas a teleconsulta não é expressamente reconhecida pela entidade. Após a vigência da Portaria do Ministério da Saúde (MS) nº 467/2020 e da Lei nº 13.989/2020,que expressamente permitem a teleconsulta em caráter excepcional e transitório, evidenciou-se que os Conselhos Regionais de Medicina dos estados adotaram posicionamentos divergentes quanto ao tema. Demonstrou-se ainda que o parecer do Conselho Federal de Medicina nº 14/2017 é vinculante e possibilita a comunicação entre o médico e o seu paciente por recursos tecnológicos,quando já houver entre eles uma relação anterior.Conclusão:a teleconsulta é prática médica ética e possível, posto que não é proibida pela Resolução CFM nº 1.643/2002, abordada diretamente no Parecer CFM nº 14/2017, mas que depende de prévia relação médico-paciente para as situações ordinárias, estando diferida (e nunca dispensada) em situações de emergenciais e sendo necessária a formalização de termo de consentimento informado digital por qualquer meio de tecnologia da informação e comunicação,desde que garanta a integridade, segurança e o sigilo das informações.

Objective: to analyze the current legislation on teleconsultation, based on the concept of medical consultation and the need for the physical examination of the patient for its characterization, as well as the limitations imposed by the Code of Medical Ethics of the Federal Council of Medicine (FCM), and by the opinions and resolutions of the Regional Councils, aiming to point out its limits and risks of informational medical negligence. Methods:qualitative and integrative review of current legislation, specialized medical and legal literature on the issue. Results: The practice of telemedicine is regulated by the Federal Council of Medicine, but teleconsultation is not expressly recognized by the entity. After the entry into force of the Administrative Rule No. 467/2020 from Ministry of Health and Law No. 13,989/2020, which expressly allows for teleconsultation in an exceptional and transitory nature, it was found that the Regional Councils of Medicine of the states adopted divergent positions regarding the theme. It was also evident that the opinion of the Federal Council of Medicine No. 14/2017 is binding and allows a "communication" between the doctor and his patient by technological resources, as long as these are already served by him.Conclusion:teleconsultation is an ethical and possible medical practice, since it is not prohibited by CFM Resolution No. 1,643/2002, addressed directly in ReportFCMnº 14/2017, but it depends on a previous doctor-patient relationship for ordinary situations, being deferred (and never dispensed) in emergency situations, being the formalization of digital informed consent by any means of information and communication technology is necessary, as long as it guarantees the integrity, security and confidentiality of information.

Objetivo: analizar la legislación vigente sobre la teleconsulta, basada en el concepto de consulta médica y la necesidad del examen físico cara a cara del paciente para su caracterización, así como las limitaciones impuestas por el Código de Ética Médica (CEM) del Consejo Federal de Medicina (CFM), por sus opiniones y resoluciones de los Consejos Regionales, con el objetivo de señalar sus límites y riesgos de negligencia médica informativa.Metodología:revisión cualitativa e integradora de la legislación vigente, la literatura médica y legal especializada sobre el tema.Resultados:El ejercicio de la telemedicina está regulado por el Consejo Federal de Medicina, pero la teleconsulta no está reconocida expresamente por la entidad. Luego de la entrada en vigor de la ordenanza del Ministerio de Salud (MS) No. 467/2020 y la Ley No. 13.989/2020, que permiten expresamente la teleconsulta con carácter excepcional y transitorio, se evidenció que los Consejos Regionales de Medicina de los estados adoptaron posiciones divergentes respecto al tema. También se evidenció que la opinión del Consejo Federal de Medicina nº14/2017 es vinculante y permite la "comunicación" entre el médico y su paciente por los recursos tecnológicos, siempre que estos ya sean atendidos por él.Conclusión:la teleconsulta es una práctica médica ética y posible, ya que no está prohibida por la Resolución CFM N ° 1.643 / 2002, abordado directamente en la opinión del CFM nº 14/2017, pero depende de una relación previa médico-paciente para situaciones ordinarias, diferirse (y nunca dispensarse) en situaciones de emergencia. La formalización de las TIC digitales por cualquier medio de tecnología de información y comunicación es necesaria, siempre que garantice la integridad, seguridad y confidencialidad de la información.

Why are brazilian orthodontists prosecuted and convicted? an overview of the contemporary jurisprudence / Por que ortodontistas brasileiros são processados ​​e condenados? uma revisão da jurisprudência contemporânea

Orthodontics figures as one of the largest community of specialists in Brazil. Unfortunately, numbers are high not only for the professionals but also for the lawsuits against them. The aim of this study was to screen the Brazilian jurisprudence in order to identify the reasons that motivated patients against orthodontists and motivated Judges towards convictions in lawsuits. The sample consisted of 395 lawsuits retrieved from the State Civil Courts of Brazil (n=27). The lawsuits were founded on conflicts between orthodontists and patients. Case-specific legal information were registered, such as patients' main reason behind the lawsuit and the decision in second instance. Chi-square and relative risk tests were calculated to investigate the influence of research variables towards conviction. Most of the lawsuits were judged in the State of São Paulo (n=151; 38.2%) and were published between 2011 and 2017 (rho: 0.797). The main reasons behind the lawsuits against orthodontists were the dissatisfaction with treatment outcomes (n=143, 36.2%), the occurrence of periodontal disease (n=45, 11.4%) and the need for tooth extractions (n=43, 10.9%). Statistically significant outcomes were detected between convictions in first and second instances and between convictions and the contractual obligation of result (p<0.001). The combination of I) patients' dissatisfaction and II) judgments under the obligation of results in second instance figure as the main risk factors for the prosecution and conviction of orthodontists.

A Ortodontia figura como uma das maiores especialidades no Brasil. Infelizmente, os números não são elevados apenas no que concerne aos profissionais, mas também quanto aos processos judiciais contra eles. O objetivo deste trabalho foi pesquisar a jurisprudência Brasileira para identificar as razões que levam os Ortodontistas a serem processados pelos pacientes e os motivos que levam os Magistrados a condená-los. A amostra consistiu de 395 processos judiciais obtidos dos Tribunais Judiciais Brasileiros (n=27). Todos os processos descreveram lides entre Ortodontistas e pacientes. Informações demográficas e legais foram registradas, como a queixa principal do paciente ao instaurar o processo e a decisão do Magistrado em segunda instância. Os testes de Qui-quadrado e de risco relativo foram utilizados para verificar a influência das variáveis sobre o desfecho. A maioria dos processos foi julgada no Estado de São Paulo (n=151; 38.2%) e publicada entre 2011 e 2017 (rho: 0.797). O principal motivo de processo contra Ortodontistas foi a insatisfação do paciente com os resultados do tratamento (n=143, 36.2%), seguido da ocorrência de doença periodontal (n=45, 11.4%) e da necessidade de extrações (n=43, 10.9%). Resultados estatisticamente significantes foram observados entre julgamentos em primeira e segunda instância e entre condenação e julgamento sob a obrigação de resultado (p<0.001). A combinação da I) insatisfação do paciente com II) o julgamentos sob a obrigação de resultados emergiram como principais fatores de risco para condenações.